Get out of the way

Tips on managing product development and engineering by John Levy, consultant, expert and author of "Get Out of the Way!, An executive’s guide to creating timely, innovative and relevant products."

My Photo
Name: John Levy
Location: Point Reyes Station, California, United States

I work with executives in high-tech who are under a lot of pressure to get products out faster without using more resources. By removing obstacles in their organization, I help them obtain predictable and consistent results. The goal is to make the product development organization a key competitive advantage for their companies. Drawing on over 30 years of experience in the computer, software and storage industries, I work by coaching managers, assisting in the design of effective organizational structures and processes, and selection of effective tools for development. My publications include articles on managing software development, and I am currently completing a book on managing development, titled “Get Out of the Way.” My technology background includes patents in computer design, work as an expert in patent litigation, advising U.S. District Court judges on technology, teaching technology courses at the college level and producing a weekly show on technology for a local public radio station.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Shifting the focus to longer term

Startup organizations are typically unsustainable and barely stable, because:

1. The pressures to develop and market a first product require taking some expedient shortcuts, such as hiring the most capable, but not necessarily the most team-oriented individuals; placing all priority on getting a workable product out the door, rather than building the product for maintainability and growth; putting in the most features rather than the best-tested features.

2. The top management habitually focuses on the race between funds running out and product delivery, rather than on internal communications, employee satisfaction (except with the potential value of their options), and leadership style. The command-and-control management style is workable for the first few years, but typically fails to inspire the organization to build itself into a self-renewing structure.

3. Having a focus on delivering a product using already-developed technology, the company does not need to invest in longer-term development of underlying technologies, or in the people who will bring in a steady stream of new technology.

The short-term focus of a startup must change soon after the deliver of the first few products. Companies that fail to incorporate longer-term thinking around their third year find themselves living from crisis to crisis. This makes the company unattractive to good managers and good technologists who don't necessarily get their jolllies from living in a startup environment, where "startup" means short-term thinking.

What sort of changes does your organization need, now that the product has been delivered? A new CEO who actually allows the organization to function as if there were competence at all levels? A seasoned technology executive who knows what to do to make the organization attractive to innovative people? A shift in emphasis to listening to customer feedback and involving existing customers in product decisions? Addition of a Quality department that actually has the teeth to delay a product introduction?

Whatever the changes needed, don't be surprised by the shift. Two reactions to the shift are typical:
(1) "What happened to my adrenaline rush?" -- the people who need crises to keep up their energy should pursue another startup.
(2) "I didn't know that a company could actually plan and execute with the future (beyond 1 month) in mind!" -- the people who are stressed by the company's failure to plan and execute for the long term grow into steady, reliable contributors.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home